Radiometric dating on sedimentary rocks
Perhaps the earth was made from older pre-existing matter, or perhaps decay rates were briefly faster for some reason. Geologic time is divided up into periods, beginning with the Precambrian, followed by the Cambrian and a number of others, leading up to the present.When one considers the power of God, one sees that any such conclusions are to some extent tentative. Some fossils are found in Precambrian rocks, but most of them are found in Cambrian and later periods.If these dates are correct, this calls the Biblical account of a recent creation of life into question.After study and discussion of this question, I now believe that the claimed accuracy of radiometric dating methods is a result of a great misunderstanding of the data, and that the various methods hardly ever agree with each other, and often do not agree with the assumed ages of the rocks in which they are found.We are told that of all the radiometric dates that are measured, only a few percent are anomalous.
We are told that these methods are accurate to a few percent, and that there are many different methods.We can assume that the Precambrian rocks already existed when life began, and so the ages of the Precambrian rocks are not necessarily related to the question of how long life has existed on earth.The Cambrian period is conventionally assumed to have begun about 550 million years ago.In order to use these methods, we have to start out with a system in which no daughter element is present, or else know how much daugher element was present initially so that it can be subtracted out.We also need to know that no parent or daughter has entered or left the system in the meantime.